github link
Accession IconSRP198761

Systematic evaluation of RNA-Seq preparation protocol performance (RNASeq: TruSeq)

Organism Icon Mus musculus
Sample Icon 6 Downloadable Samples
Technology Badge IconIllumina HiSeq 2500

Submitter Supplied Information

Description
In this study, we present a comprehensive evaluation of four RNA-Seq library preparation methods. We used three standard input protocols, the Illumina TruSeq Stranded Total RNA and TruSeq Stranded mRNA kits, and a modified NuGEN Ovation v2 kit; and an ultra-low-input RNA protocol, the TaKaRa SMARTer Ultra Low RNA Kit v3. Our evaluation of these kits included quality control measures such as overall reproducibility, 5' and 3' end-bias, and the identification of DEGs, lncRNAs, and alternatively spliced transcripts. Overall, we found that the two Illumina kits were most similar in terms of recovering DEGs, and the Illumina, modified NuGEN, and TaKaRa kits allowed identification of a similar set of DEGs. However, we also discovered that the Illumina, NuGEN and TaKaRa kits each enriched for different sets of genes. Overall design: Three mESC cell lines (biological replicates) from Zbtb24 knockout (1lox/1lox) clones are compared with three wild-type (2lox/+) clones (biological replicates) using the TruSeq mRNA protocol.
PubMed ID
Total Samples
6
Submitter’s Institution
No associated institution

Samples

Show of 0 Total Samples
Filter
Add/Remove
Accession Code
Title
Specimen part
Cell line
Subject
Processing Information
Additional Metadata
No rows found
Loading...