github link
Accession IconSRP072209

The dual role of LSD1 and HDAC3 in STAT5-dependent transcription is determined by protein interactions, binding affinities, motifs and genomic positions [RNA-seq]

Organism Icon Mus musculus
Sample Icon 24 Downloadable Samples
Technology Badge IconIllumina HiSeq 2000, NextSeq 500

Submitter Supplied Information

Description
STAT5 interacts with other factors to control transcription, and the mechanism of regulation is of interest as constitutive active STAT5 has been reported in malignancies. Here LSD1 and HDAC3 were identified as novel STAT5a interacting partners in pro-B cells. Characterization of STAT5a, LSD1 and HDAC3 target genes by ChIP-seq and RNA-seq revealed gene subsets regulated by independent or combined action of the factors and LSD1/HDAC3 to play dual role in their activation or repression. Genes bound by STAT5a alone or in combination with weakly associated LSD1 or HDAC3 were enriched for the canonical STAT5a dimer motif, and such binding induced activation or repression. Strong STAT5 binding was seen more frequently in intergenic regions, which might function as distal enhancer elements. Genes bound weakly by STAT5a and strongly by LSD1/HDAC3 present a STAT5a monomer like motif, and are differentially regulated based on their biological role, genomic binding localization and affinity. STAT5a binding in monomer like motifs was found with increased frequency in promoters, indicating a requirement for stabilization by additional factors, which might recruit LSD1/HDAC3. Our study describes an interaction network of STAT5a/LSD1/HDAC3 and a dual function of LSD1/HDAC3 on STAT5-dependent transcription, defined by protein-protein interactions, genomic binding positions-affinities and motifs. Overall design: Mouse pro-B Ba/F3 cells treated with lentiviral vectors expressing short-hairpins to knock-down various genes (STAT5a, STAT5b, LSD1 and HDAC3). All KDs were analysed versus cells treated with lentiviral construct expressing a No-Target short-hairpin at the same condition (either minus [IL3 deprivation for 6h] or plus [IL3 deprivation for 6h and IL3 stimulation for 30min]). Wild-type cells were also generated and compared between the two conditions. All samples contain biological replicates (3-5 depending on the sample).
PubMed ID
Total Samples
27
Submitter’s Institution
No associated institution

Samples

Show of 0 Total Samples
Filter
Add/Remove
Accession Code
Title
Cell line
Treatment
Subject
Processing Information
Additional Metadata
No rows found
Loading...